However, some employers may not be used to seeing resumes in this format and may find it confusing and hard to follow. A functional resume is also a good format to you if you have held jobs in different fields, as you are likely to have acquired various skills in these jobs. This type of resume is best suited for you if you have gaps in your work history because by not listing your information chronologically, you can make these gaps less noticeable. You usually put your work history at the bottom of your resume. Instead of organising your information in a chronological order, your skills and achievements are organised into categories. You are applying for a senior executive position.Ī functional resume highlights your skills and abilities.
You are a new graduate, and you have experience in a the field you are applying for.You have worked for companies that are recognised nationally.Your work history shows progressive experience within the same career field, if you are applying for a job in the same field.Situations where a chronological resume works best for you: However, if you gaps in your career path or if you have changed careers often, then a chronological resume may not be suitable for you, as it will dramatise these gaps and career changes.
#FUNCTIONAL RESUME FULL#
If you are applying for a job in the same industry, the full chronology will be relevant to your prospective employer. It works well if you have a very consistent career life. It lists information in chronological order, starting with the most recent information. Chronological resumes:Ī chronological resume is straightforward and easy to scan, making it the most commonly used format. Here is the difference between the two and what could work best for you, depending on your situation: 1. There are a variety of situations in which each certain formats can work differently.
The most common ones are chronological format and functional format. It’s main purpose is to market yourself to your prospective employers, and hopefully it will land you an interview or two.
0 kommentar(er)
